According to the latest available figures from the Turkish Directorate General of Migration Management (DGMM), there are more than 5* million foreign nationals present in Turkish territory, 3.7* million of whom are seeking international protection. Most of those seeking international protection are Syrians (3,737,369* individuals: 3,685,898* urban caseload and 51,471* residing in camps) who are granted temporary protection status in Turkey.

According to DGMM, as of end of 2021, there were 29,256* international protection applicants most frequently nationals of  Afghanistan, Iraq and The Islamic Republic of Iran constitute another group of foreign nationals seeking Turkish humanitarian and legal protection.1 There is an increase of ~93,000 individuals in the number of Syrian nationals in comparison to last year’s figures. In addition, there are 1,314,181* foreign nationals present in Turkey holding residency permits including humanitarian residence holders. The exact number of the humanitarian residence holders is unknown, but it is estimated that there are a few thousand humanitarian resident holders. According to DGMM, 162,996* irregular migrants of different nationalities were apprehended Turkey in 2021.

*Data source DGMM, 31.12.2021

Cette étude met à jour les données concernant le niveau de satisfaction de 260 migrants ivoiriens de retour ayant bénéficié d'assistance en espèces et l'impact sur leur réintégration socioéconomique durable. Les données ont été recueillies entre octobre 2020 et mai 2021 au travers d'enquêtes téléphonique et sur le terrain.

Between the 3rd and 9th of January 2022, a total of 3,118 movements were recorded in Adamawa and Borno States. The recorded movements consisted of 2,746 arrivals and 372 departures. Arrivals were recorded at locations in Askira/Uba, Bama, Biu, Gwoza, Hawul, Kala/Balge, Monguno and Ngala Local Government Areas (LGAs) of the most conflict-affected Borno State and in Girei, Gombi, Hong, Lamurde, Maiha, Michika, Mubi South, Numan, Yola North and Yola South LGAs of Adamawa State.

El presente reporte DTM incluye información de caracterización por sexo y rango etario de la población refugiada y migrante nacional venezolana presente en los departamentos de Colombia seleccionados para la recolección y su intención de desplazamiento hacia otros países de la región. 

According to the latest available figures from the Turkish Directorate General of Migration Management (DGMM), there are more than 5* million foreign nationals present in Turkish territory, 3.7* million of whom are seeking international protection. Most are Syrians (3,736,799* individuals) who are granted temporary protection status. In addition, international protection applicants from countries including Afghanistan, the Islamic Republic of Iran and Iraq constitute another group of foreign nationals. According to DGMM, there were 31,334* international protection applicants present in Turkey in 20201, published annually. Moreover,  according to UNHCR**, there are close to 330,000 international protection status holders and asylum-seekers. Since September 2021 the number of Syrians residing in camps has decreased by 708.

*Data source DGMM, 30.12.2021
**Data source UNHCR, October 2021

During the reporting period (05 to 11 January 2022), a total of 31 movements were recorded - 23 Arrivals (947 individuals), 6
departures (419 individuals), and 2 Transits (92 individuals). The largest arrival movements were recorded in Ancuabe (379
individuals) and Nangade (337individuals). The largest departures were observed in Montepuez (283 individuals), Nampula (66 individuals), and Ibo (66 individuals). The largest transit was recorded in Mueda (92 individuals). Of the total population captured by the ETT, 63 per cent were displaced for the rst time, and 37 per cent of reported IDPs had been displaced more than once prior to this latest movement.

Entre le 15 et le 31 août 2021, l'Organisation internationale pour les migrations (OIM), par le biais de l'unité DTM (Matrice de suivi des déplacements), a mené des enquêtes d'évaluation dans les zones de retour dans la province du Nord-Kivu, en République démocratique du Congo (RDC). En ligne avec les directives du Comité permanent inter-agences (IASC) sur les solutions durables pour les personnes déplacées, cette évaluation a pour but de mesurer la sévérité des conditions de vie des personnes déplacées dans les lieux de retour ainsi que les progrès effectués en termes de dépassement des vulnérabilités. Les résultats de cet exercice serviont à informer les partneraires pertinents gouvernementaux ainsi que la communauté humanitaire sur les besoins spécifiques pour l'amélioration des condition de vie, la reconstruction et les défis de consolidation de la paix (i.e. les solutions durables) dans les communautés de retour pour permettre une programmation de réponses plus informées et appropriées en conformité avec le Cadre de l'OIM pour la résolution progressive des situations de déplacement (2018).

IOM COVID-19 Impact on Points of Entry Bi-Weekly Analysis is meant to serve IOM Member States, IOM, UN and voluntary partner agencies, the civil society (including media) as well as the general population in analysing the impact of COVID-19 pandemic on Points of Entry. It is particularly relevant when identifying and addressing specific needs faced by migrants and mobile populations, disproportionately affected by global mobility restrictions. The report is based on information provided by IOM field staff, using resources available at the IOM country office level and is accurate to the best of IOM’s knowledge at the time of compilation. All information is being constantly validated, including the geolocation and attributes, and through regular assessments and triangulation of information. The updates depend on the time frame within which the information becomes available and is processed by IOM. For this reason, the analysis is always dated and timestamped in order to reflect reality at a given time. However, as the situation continuously evolves and changes, despite IOM’s best efforts, the analysis may not always accurately reflect the multiple and simultaneous restrictive measures being imposed at a specific location.