Assessment Report

บทสรุป: สรุปข้อมูลสำคัญนี้มีจุดมุ่งหมายเพื่อนำเสนอภาพรวมของสภาวการณ์ ความต้องการ และความท้าทายตามประเด็นหัวข้อต่าง ๆ ในหมู่ผู้ย้ายถิ่นชาวเมียนมาในจังหวัดระนองที่ไอโอเอ็ม ประเทศไทยได้ดำเนินการประเมินความต้องการหลายภาคส่วนระหว่างเดือนกันยายนถึงพฤศจิกายน พ.ศ. 2566 เพื่อให้ข้อมูลเชิงลึกเกี่ยวกับระดับความรุนแรงของความต้องการของประชากรผู้ย้ายถิ่น ระบุกลุ่มประชากรที่เปราะบางและพื้นที่ทางภูมิศาสตร์ซึ่งมีความต้องการระดับสูงสุด รวมทั้งนำเสนอข้อมูลเพื่อการวางแผนให้ความช่วยเหลือและเป้าหมายย่อยของเป้าหมายการพัฒนาที่ยั่งยืน (SDGs) ที่เกี่ยวข้อง และเป็นเส้นฐานรายภาคส่วนและระหว่างภาคส่วนสำหรับการประเมินต่าง ๆ ในอนาคต

Since October 8 there has been an increase in cross-border incidents between Israel and Lebanon, resulting in the displacement of people both within the South and elsewhere within the country. Since October 10, the Displacement Tracking Matrix (DTM) has been conducting the daily monitoring of population movements. The objective of the exercise is to inform preparedness and response planning.

This factsheet aims to provide a snapshot of multi-sectoral conditions, needs, and challenges among Myanmar migrants in Phetchabun as captured in August 2024 by IOM Thailand’s multi-sectoral assessment of needs. The purpose of this assessment is to provide insights regarding the severity of needs among migrant populations, identify vulnerable population groups and geographic areas with the most acute needs, inform assistance planning and relevant Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) targets, and provide sectoral and inter-sectoral baselines for future assessments.

This report provides insights into the profiles, experiences, needs, routes travelled and intentions of migrants transiting through the Western Balkans. IOM surveyed 924 migrants from 1 August to 31 August 2024 in Albania, Bosnia and Herzegovina, Montenegro, North Macedonia, Serbia and Kosovo*.

*References to Kosovo* shall be understood in the context of UN Security Council Resolution 1244 (1999).

Since October 8 there has been an increase in cross-border incidents between Israel and Lebanon, resulting in the displacement of people both within the South and elsewhere within the country. Since October 10, the Displacement Tracking Matrix (DTM) has been conducting the daily monitoring of population movements. The objective of the exercise is to inform preparedness and response planning.

This report presents a deeper country-specific dive into the findings of the qualitative analysis of seven focus group discussions conducted between 1 and 15 August 2023 in Guara Guara and Macomia with 103 representatives of IDPs, host community, and returnees. Over two thirds (65%) of the respondents were female. Seventy-two per cent of respondents were between the age of 18 and 59, and the remaining 20 per cent were older than 60 years and 8 per cent were under the age of 17.

This report provides insights into the profiles, experiences, needs, routes travelled and intentions of migrants transiting through Bosnia and Herzegovina (BiH). Data was collected from 1 to 30 August 2024. IOM carried out a route observation exercise in the Republika Srpska, Sarajevo Canton, Posavina Canton, Tuzla Canton, Bosnian-Podrinje Canton and Una Sana Canton to monitor trends in entries and exits as well as transit modalities within BiH. IOM also surveyed 288 migrants in active transit locations such as bus stops or at key entry and exit locations throughout the country as well as in four transit reception centres (TRCs) in BiH (Lipa, Ušivak, Borići and Blažuj).

Household level data collected through the DTM Site Assessment (SA) is a powerful tool to better understand how IDPs' preferences towards durable solutions are impacted by the regional context, as well as reasons for displacement, and how long displaced households have been in their current location of displacement. For instance, while most IDPs displaced due to conflict in Somali region see local integration as their preferred durable solutions pathway, most conflict-IDPs in Tigray region have a preference for return. 

In addition, household level data gathered though the DTM Site Assessment (SA) and Village Assessment Survey (VAS) can help define profiles of displaced and returned populations, and can also be compiled into an index to measure, monitor and compare the living conditions and socio-economic situation of IDPs and returning IDPs across the assessed locations. The indexes also allow for the prioritization of locations to support needs-based interventions. 

Round 8, which took place from August 1 to September 4, 2024, indicates the presence of 702,973 internally displaced persons in Haiti, almost 22% more than in Round 7.

The armed attacks in the municipality of Gressier (located in the West department, outside the MAPAP) are the main reason for this increase; this municipality has been almost emptied of its population following these attacks and has become the second municipality of origin of IDPs in the country whereas it was in 5th position during Round 7.

 A slight decrease (6%) in the number of IDPs was observed in the MAPAP, reflecting the continuation of displacement from the capital to provinces but in smaller proportions compared to the period of March-April 2024. Returns of some IDPs that was also observed, in particular in certain neighborhoods of the municipality of Cité Soleil (see the section on returnees).

 The MAPAP currently hosts a quarter of the country's IDPs, compared to nearly a third in Round 7 (25% in Round 8 vs 32% in Round 7).

Provinces thus host 75% of the country's IDPs. In particular, the Great South (departments of South, Grande'Anse, South-East and Nippes) which host almost half of IDPs: 45% of the country's IDPs are hosted in these 4 departments.

  The West Department, particularly the MAPAP, is the provenance of the vast majority of IDPs in all departments. The only exception is Artibonite, where 56% of IDPs fled from areas within the same department..

 At the national level, the majority of IDPs are hosted in host families/out of sites: 83% (vs 17% in sites). However, in the MAPAP the majority of IDPs reside in sites (63% in sites vs. 37% in host families/out of sites), while in provinces the opposite is true (98% in host families/out of sites vs. 2% in sites).

, 65,535 returnees formerly IDPs were identified, particularly in the commune of Cité Soleil where a 151% increase in the number of returnees was observed. It should be noted that for the moment these returns remain very fragile and are not sustainable, particularly in the MAPAP. Indeed, returnees are often displaced again following new attacks in their return area: in the MAPAP, 52% of IDPs have already been displaced more than once and these multiple movements include new ones after returning home  

Ovaj izveštaj pruža uvid u profile, iskustva i putovanja migranata koji prolaze kroz Republiku Srbiju. Podaci su prikupljani od 1. do 31. avgusta 2024. godine u saradnji sa Komesarijatom za izbeglice i migracije Republike Srbije (KIRS). Uzorak čine 206 migranata, anketiranih u centrima za azil (AC) Sjenica, (AC) Krnjaca, (AC) Obrenovac, te prihvatnim centrima (PC) Preševo i (PC) Bujanovac.